Current:Home > MyTulsi Gabbard on Climate Change: Where the Candidate Stands -Blueprint Wealth Network
Tulsi Gabbard on Climate Change: Where the Candidate Stands
View
Date:2025-04-14 22:48:56
“Reaching 100 percent renewable energy as quickly as possible is required to save our planet from the worst effects of climate change.”
—Tulsi Gabbard, February 2019
Been There
Rep. Tulsi Gabbard’s home state of Hawaii is a constant reminder to her of the risks that come with climate change. Months after her election to Congress in 2012, she opposed a budget sequestration plan that would have resulted in the furlough of 2,600 employees at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, saying the move would make it harder to fight climate change. In 2017, she denounced President Trump’s decision to withdraw from the Paris climate accord, saying climate change “threatens the safety and security of the planet, especially in places like Hawaii where we are already experiencing its devastating effects.”
Done That
Gabbard, an Iraq war veteran, introduced the Off Fossil Fuels for a Better Future Act, or OFF Act, in Congress in 2017 to promote a “just transition” from fossil fuels to cleaner energy sources. In the legislation, she described the disproportionate impact of fossil fuels production on communities of color and proposed requiring 100 percent of electricity sold in the U.S. to come from clean energy sources by 2035. She also proposed requiring manufacturers to sell only zero-emissions vehicles, the electrification of train rail lines and engines, ending fossil fuel subsidies, and extending tax credits for wind and solar production and investment.
The ideas Gabbard set out in the OFF Act included a charge to modernize electricity grids to help states set renewable energy standards, like the 100 percent renewable energy goal set in 2015 in Hawaii. Gabbard advocates for “significant investments” in renewable energy technology like energy storage and for loan guarantees for utility-scale renewable energy projects. She has sided with climate activists on most issues and has a 94 percent scorecard from the League of Conservation Voters.
Getting Specific
- Gabbard expressed early support for the Green New Deal, but when the resolution was released, she opted not to be a co-sponsor, citing concerns over the “vagueness of the language.” On her website, Gabbard said she supports the Green New Deal’s zero-emissions goals, but “I do not support ‘leaving the door open’ to nuclear power unless and until there is a permanent solution to the problem of nuclear waste.”
- Gabbard supports a ban on fracking and ending fossil fuel and nuclear energy subsidies. She has talked about the importance of investing in sustainable infrastructure and agriculture, calling agriculture “something that’s not often talked about when we’re dealing with climate change, but is one of the biggest contributors of carbon to our environment and to our atmosphere.”
- She believes the U.S. “should be leading by example, leveraging innovation through science and technology, investing in clean energy, creating renewable energy jobs that cannot be outsourced, growing the economy, enhancing U.S. energy independence, and lowering energy costs for families and businesses, while reducing carbon emissions. We must continue to persevere and do our part to support efforts in the private sector and at all levels of government to combat climate change and protect our environment.”
- In the OFF Act, she proposed redirecting fossil fuel tax credits toward renewable energy, but doesn’t outline a carbon pricing plan. Like many of her opponents, Gabbard has signed the No Fossil Fuel Funding pledge.
Our Take
Gabbard has a track record of speaking out in support of clean energy and climate policies, including sponsoring legislation, but her decision to back away from her early endorsement of the Green New Deal felt poorly played for someone who has described climate action as being treated like “political football.” Her past comments on LGBTQ rights and “radical Islamic ideology” could also alienate her from some progressive voters.
Read Tulsi Gabbard’s climate webpage
Read more candidate profiles.
veryGood! (11556)
Related
- US appeals court rejects Nasdaq’s diversity rules for company boards
- A California company has received FAA certification for its flying car
- Oil Investors Call for Human Rights Risk Report After Standing Rock
- South Dakota Backs Off Harsh New Protest Law and ‘Riot-Boosting’ Penalties
- Juan Soto to be introduced by Mets at Citi Field after striking record $765 million, 15
- Best Friend Day Gifts Under $100: Here's What To Buy the Bestie That Has It All
- 1.5 Degrees Warming and the Search for Climate Justice for the Poor
- Ariana Madix Reveals Where She Stands on Marriage After Tom Sandoval Affair
- How to watch new prequel series 'Dexter: Original Sin': Premiere date, cast, streaming
- Beyoncé Handles Minor Wardrobe Malfunction With Ease During Renaissance Show
Ranking
- The 401(k) millionaires club keeps growing. We'll tell you how to join.
- This Is the Only Lip Product You Need in Your Bag This Summer
- These Cities Want to Ban Natural Gas. But Would It Be Legal?
- Alligator attacks and kills woman who was walking her dog in South Carolina
- Small twin
- These cities are having drone shows instead of fireworks displays for Fourth of July celebrations
- Judge Orders Dakota Access Pipeline Spill Response Plan, with Tribe’s Input
- Tips to help dogs during fireworks on the Fourth of July
Recommendation
Scoot flight from Singapore to Wuhan turns back after 'technical issue' detected
Plan to Burn Hurricane Debris Sparks Health Fears in U.S. Virgin Islands
DC Young Fly Shares How His and Jacky Oh's Kids Are Coping Days After Her Death
Ice Storm Aftermath: More Climate Extremes Ahead for Galveston
House passes bill to add 66 new federal judgeships, but prospects murky after Biden veto threat
IPCC: Radical Energy Transformation Needed to Avoid 1.5 Degrees Global Warming
The US Wants the EU to Delay Imposing Trade Penalties on Carbon-Intensive Imports, But Is Considering Imposing Its Own
Utilities Are Promising Net Zero Carbon Emissions, But Don’t Expect Big Changes Soon