Current:Home > MyCourt takes new look at whether Musk post illegally threatened workers with loss of stock options -Blueprint Wealth Network
Court takes new look at whether Musk post illegally threatened workers with loss of stock options
View
Date:2025-04-14 05:34:03
NEW ORLEANS (AP) — A group of federal appeals court judges in New Orleans is deciding whether a 2018 Twitter post by Tesla CEO Elon Musk unlawfully threatened Tesla employees with the loss of stock options if they decided to be represented by a union.
The National Labor Relations Board said it was an illegal threat. Three judges on the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans upheld that decision, as well as a related NLRB order that Tesla rehire a fired employee, with back pay.
But the full 5th Circuit later threw out that decision and voted to hear the matter again, resulting in a hearing Thursday before a panel of 17 judges. Attorneys for Tesla, the NLRB and the union grappled with questions including whether the post counted as a threat to workers because it appeared in a public discussion on his personal account and not in the workplace or on a Tesla forum.
“It’s not in the workplace,” Judge Cory Wilson said as he questioned union attorney Daniel Curry.
“It’s still getting to the workers,” Curry responded.
The judges gave no indication when they would rule.
The case involved a post made during United Auto Workers organizing efforts at a Tesla facility in Fremont, California. The post was made years before Musk bought the platform, now known as X, in 2022.
On May 20, 2018, Musk tweeted: “Nothing stopping Tesla team at our car plant from voting union. Could do so tmrw if they wanted. But why pay union dues and give up stock options for nothing? Our safety record is 2X better than when plant was UAW & everybody already gets healthcare.”
veryGood! (2731)
Related
- Realtor group picks top 10 housing hot spots for 2025: Did your city make the list?
- Why Chris Evans Deactivated His Social Media Accounts
- Ecuador’s High Court Rules That Wild Animals Have Legal Rights
- In the Philippines, a Landmark Finding Moves Fossil Fuel Companies’ Climate Liability into the Realm of Human Rights
- Why Sean "Diddy" Combs Is Being Given a Laptop in Jail Amid Witness Intimidation Fears
- Game of Thrones' Kit Harington and Rose Leslie Welcome Baby No. 2
- Pamper Yourself With the Top 18 Trending Beauty Products on Amazon Right Now
- 10 Trendy Amazon Jewelry Finds You'll Want to Wear All the Time
- Jamie Foxx gets stitches after a glass is thrown at him during dinner in Beverly Hills
- Will Kim Cattrall Play Samantha Again After And Just Like That Cameo? She Says..
Ranking
- Which apps offer encrypted messaging? How to switch and what to know after feds’ warning
- Charlie Puth Blasts Trend of Throwing Objects at Performers After Kelsea Ballerini's Onstage Incident
- North Carolina’s Bet on Biomass Energy Is Faltering, With Energy Targets Unmet and Concerns About Environmental Justice
- The path to Bed Bath & Beyond's downfall
- Pregnant Kylie Kelce Shares Hilarious Question Her Daughter Asked Jason Kelce Amid Rising Fame
- Kate Spade 24-Hour Flash Deal: Get This $400 Satchel Bag for Just $89
- Every Time Margot Robbie Channeled Barbie IRL
- Indian Court Rules That Nature Has Legal Status on Par With Humans—and That Humans Are Required to Protect It
Recommendation
Trump suggestion that Egypt, Jordan absorb Palestinians from Gaza draws rejections, confusion
Warming Trends: Nature and Health Studies Focused on the Privileged, $1B for Climate School and Old Tires Detour Into Concrete
Pamper Yourself With the Top 18 Trending Beauty Products on Amazon Right Now
'Let's Get It On' ... in court
US appeals court rejects Nasdaq’s diversity rules for company boards
Indian Court Rules That Nature Has Legal Status on Par With Humans—and That Humans Are Required to Protect It
The Chevy Bolt, GM's popular electric vehicle, is on its way out
Twitter removes all labels about government ties from NPR and other outlets